Ellis Forest Improvements Co. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Ellis Forest Improvements Co. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation Insurance

878 P.2d 431, 129 Or. App. 595, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1201

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 10, 1994

Docket91-05-031; CA A76950

StatusPublished

This text of 878 P.2d 431 (Ellis Forest Improvements Co. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis Forest Improvements Co. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, 878 P.2d 431, 129 Or. App. 595, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1201 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

SAIF sought review of a Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF)¹ amended final order requiring it to rebill Ellis Forest Improvements Co., deleting charges for additional workers’ compensation premiums. We affirmed without opinion, Ellis Forest v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 123 Or App 359, 859 P2d 1208 (1993). On review, the Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded to us for reconsideration in light of S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 318 Or 614, 872 P2d 1 (1994). Ellis Forest v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 319 Or 79, 872 P2d 14 (1994).

We hold that DIF erred in concluding that B. Ellis was a nonsubject worker based on the exemption in ORS 656.027(7). Parker Furniture v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 128 Or App 466, 876 P2d 837 (1994).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

SAIF sought review of a Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF)¹ amended final order requiring it to rebill Ellis Forest Improvements Co., deleting charges for additional workers’ compensation premiums. We affirmed without opinion, Ellis Forest v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 123 Or App 359, 859 P2d 1208 (1993). On review, the Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded to us for reconsideration in light of S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 318 Or 614, 872 P2d 1 (1994). Ellis Forest v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 319 Or 79, 872 P2d 14 (1994).

We hold that DIF erred in concluding that B. Ellis was a nonsubject worker based on the exemption in ORS 656.027(7). Parker Furniture v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 128 Or App 466, 876 P2d 837 (1994).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

878 P.2d 431, 129 Or. App. 595, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-forest-improvements-co-v-filings-of-the-national-council-on-orctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack