Ellis, Eugene James
This text of Ellis, Eugene James (Ellis, Eugene James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
3/,55`<§/ ‘ HCF HE@EW HM
fu eve 3217/723 E 111's, #7533511' COURTOFCF?MNALAPP~M \A// //1117)7 19 C/@mewts dn?t AUG 17 2515 9601 5 par 591
Amar1`11 o Texas 79107 9606 " 71 ` A@@M@@SF@,©/@Fk
l111 1111 60115111'117101\1111 601/1117 101111 F'o/z 7115111)1157011 1)1v15_101\1
- Dl$ 7/1€ T OF 11AHR1S CO111\11`11111@)'11©1\1 ge §1% DN'E ' ` ~ ; ' . 1312 -
§113€@@ Fgm@$ 511/5 ' CM, /\/O_ 1 55 251 ,
199 fit/over Ca$€ /\10. 94 20 §425 ` 1$, 1 _ figzr¢s_§@_n_tg_ E)< 131sz EueENE 111/1155 Ems 37 1 P£T111o1\1 FOB 11 me of~ mmm
h Q[$ZWCZ` §1‘;0[77:# ['&g[/es /?ogc_;‘m‘lzal _QLLQ_N££BAAL'[Q
5 (:Q“zzf_§¢[kr]g ng;[es Qacar/sse
I 5M.;1;1;11£111z 1215 1111'[11" ;5'”"
l
Petnfioner fué/ene frames 151/15 pro se #755355; was tried 177 1119 357
jad/e/'a'/ D/sl`r/'cl‘ [0111"2‘ of Ha)’r/s [0117)1/3 077 ME}%L_LY_CI_Q_ 13 07” a
charge of 5e1<11a/a55au1t 111/uch resulted /77 a /)11773j11r_1/ Fez“itmne'r was 511175egue711`1g imprvper/j reind)cl‘ed 177 ?/7112L 1112 77211//771101777€772‘ 17011) 7”€11<1 113 ravafed ~"¢m improper e77/71171ce771e712L f 17 117€ refria/, petitmner was
7%1177¢/5111'/2‘5 077 MH¢U&SaWJ sevier/ied 10 _11£¢;177 z*/7e Texas De/Qarz`~
777€771.‘ 01 (r/'m/'na/ ]hsz`ic@ 1775151 fut/omc/ D)'v)s)o'n
Pacg€ 1 o?C 5
Tl d/§Togz Q/; ~U,;» QA§E
Pez“it/'o;zer was charged wit/v a crim|e Z‘/)a[ a//ejeq'/j occurred on or aéou?.‘ fee S’Q' day of jan.,. /993 in the city of /'/ousz‘@w, /'w Hzm’/'S C'oaml‘j» PeT/'Z/'om=r was }n¢//'cte 077 or ahead Z/ze 75"’1’01‘“ jan 7995 avc/ /ms been /'71 ,DV/sow 5/')7ce on Z‘})/s eharje, //e now reside§ af t/ze f/eme)vf§ Z/m'z° at /7'777¢17'/'//0 7e;xas /)Z' i/?e time of fha Z‘r/'a/, the Heo.secaz‘or was C/mr/e: /?ose;;z‘/$a/, z‘/)e twa/judge was Lm€s B‘arf anal the counl:g c/er/< [/MT/€$ Bacar/sse 771/§ peizZ/'o)v /s c//'reciec/ § W/Ic)ever'/s m Z‘/)e ahp/dal capac/'-Z:q now
m _@_UO__\AM_`\BEANIO_
77))5 /'5 f/)e proper procedure Z`a chall/enje Z“/)e jurisdiction 076 a
prosecuic)r, a]u¢/je ora c/er/f 7Z'ej cam?oz‘ be a#ac/ 77a/sf be attacked m a QHO Warmm“o procedure See gai/Qomk vs _S’tate af 7éxas, 03- -% 003//3 cv (e 20 97),. 942 sw 2d 574, 994 w.zd 3)4, IIZ_ABG.MM.E_NI '/77€ Um'z‘e.c/ 51¢‘[€.5 &nst/'Z‘a`('/z>n regu)res féaz‘ a// elected 07' appointed alc/F/'cI/z)s af Z‘/?€ pub/ic Zrc/sf, £efere z‘a/')y Z“/ve oat/1 of office s£al/ swem'm" az%'rm z'/mt Z‘})\ej have nat pajed 07 presumed amy mow/es 07' Z/v/'/)§s of m/ue pfdm/$ed emp/oymenf ar Wpoiwz"menf as pub} /c off/c/a/s m 07"0/€'/ to secure Val‘es, 7Ze 4772‘/ ér/ber_t/ oat/7 771qu [72 7[//ec) will/1 Z`/ze gearel‘afy of jz‘az‘e éefore swear/bg in or m%'/mmg z‘o z‘/7e oaf/v of off/ce W?e erc/a/ owners Z‘o 71;1/2‘)7)[¢)//_)/ mecqu />/'5 07’ /’791” duties fo /)7”€» 5€;”1/6, protect anc/ de?pe)m/ the @st/tat¢om of z‘/ze [/m`z‘ec} Stalfez amf f/Ie Staz‘e m w/)/'c/) z‘/)ej operate fee 7ex fonsi /»¥¢'2‘, m §1 7;/€ Omcia/s mu>'Z'L f/€ documents fe/az‘eJ to ajhér fea/end <§¢ Sfate adi/25 .Pag€ 2 of 5 as whal‘ever the form 111 which fha Goreroweoz‘ 7€1111:1‘1'0113 Ao_qooe enter/115 info an cyreemen£ with thai Goverrrmer)z‘ Z‘o/ 19912) 01’15111¢/ proceed/113 fa//ure to take the oath of mcfwe renders any judicial act Vv/(/ The enacZ‘/'og afa sl‘afute 1'£15 presumed that 1.)€0111p/1cmee w/?,‘h the Consl‘il‘utmn of Z`he $Z‘ate and Z‘he L/n/Z‘ed SZuTes 15 an‘ended,' 2) the 011/g means ofcha//e1131'11g judges au?hor/“z‘y is through a Quo Warrao?“o act/071 111 wh/ch the sl‘o.z‘e /s the 111despe1151h/e pariy, ;:ewis gs QZQ/€€ 011 Sw.atd 392 395 [7'5< App Da//os 191?2),' 0r1j/71a/ proceeding £LLe_Z'o supra 1\/,4, ,p£ ,5 of§ / 3) f/ected judges must ta/ Orc/er dismiss/1151 the judgment with prejudwe. Pag@ 5 Of 5 Jz_eaaeeuse)_a 1 Quo Warraht'o is the proper procedure for attaching a j'uoé¢]r))eht ` when the projecutor judge ami court clerk 111 the stated case cio mt have their credentials as required hy the Cohstitatioh ami statutes z“o operate 1'11 their off/'ciai functiow for the Government, ff any of them cio not have the reiuireoi credentia/s, then a// actions 1'11 this case must he elec/aired voio(, AB 11\111'10, _ _ Quo Wurranto is a prerogative writ which means ohe does not have to prove anythinda, 011/y maheu the accusation The burden of /)r<_)o)c how Shitts~ to the Opposinj§part_q, 321 EgAzeg 5"`05:_ 551ng /:07’ r€a50775 $tateoi here/ul supported h_y iaw, petzt)o??€f herehy ` moves the court to dec/are the act/iam of the prosecutor, judge ami Cou‘rt C/Grif i71 V/'O/at'ion 076 the /aw>’ hand St'a“£u‘ile$ of the dwi'i'eci $Z`a'[e_s" aho' issue a writ of Quo Warran?`o dee/arinj their actions voio' ami dec/are the °convictiorz of the petitioner 1111// ami VOici. 1413 11\/1"T10 i huge 14 ht" 5 1 \ i /\`, . n '" CERT{F)CATE OF SERVICE. I fugene games i;'iiis,"ik "F7533551P do here/nj Certi@ that a true anei Correct copy of the ahov€ petition was sent to /1’arr1s C°oum‘j District C/er/< anal to the Courtot` Cr)mma/Ap/oea/s 7he 7%1*9501113 pe tit/on was served hj p/acz??ae the same 111 the tin/ted States ma/`/, postage prepa/et 011 this thth;/’ c/aj of August /.,ZDJ§ Eug€n€ imes Eiii$, petitioner INMAT/:’s D£ECLARA T1o1\1 I Eujehe james t'///`s ”"153359, 11111 the petitioner ami am present/j mcarcerated 111 the i/\/////am /9 firemeth U111t c/ec/are underpena/tj of perjury that accord/113 to 111_¢/ heilef the facts stated 111 the ahove petit/011 are true aho/ correct Execute¢i and sgueo’ 011 Augu;t 13 j ,201_5 less gas Eu;ene ]Zmes E/iis Fetitio'ner .Pag€ 5 of 5 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ellis, Eugene James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-eugene-james-tex-2015.