Elliott v. United States
This text of 511 F. App'x 253 (Elliott v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Damon Emanuel Elliott appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Elliott leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Elliott v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-03350-PJM (D.Md. Nov. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 F. App'x 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-united-states-ca4-2013.