Elliott v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co.
119 P. 19, 66 Wash. 701
Opinion
This appeal involves only the denial of a motion for a continuance of the trial of the case, upon the same grounds as the motion for a continuance in the case of Steenstrup v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co., ante p. 101, 119 Pac. 16. For the reasons there stated, we conclude that there was no error in tbe denial of the motion for a continuance in this case. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elliott v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co., 119 P. 19, 66 Wash. 701 (Wash. 1911).
119 P. 19 (Elliott v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steenstrup v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co.
119 P. 16 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)