Elliott v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co.
This text of 119 P. 19 (Elliott v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal involves only the denial of a motion for a continuance of the trial of the case, upon the same grounds as the motion for a continuance in the case of Steenstrup v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co., ante p. 101, 119 Pac. 16. For the reasons there stated, we conclude that there was no error in tbe denial of the motion for a continuance in this case. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 P. 19, 66 Wash. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-toledo-foundry-machine-co-wash-1911.