Elliott v. Swinton

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 569
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 3, 1769
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 569 (Elliott v. Swinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elliott v. Swinton, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 569 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1769).

Opinion

September 26, 1769. Bill sets forth two bonds given to plaintiff by Jacob Loock-erman of St. John’s Parish, Georgia; Loockerman’s proof of insolvency and as[570]*570signment of real and personal property to William Swinton in trust for Swinton, Forbes and Company, Francis Arthur and Company; sale of property by Swinton and his receiving bonds in payment; assignment of Swinton’s share of business of Swinton, Forbes and Michie; collection by Forbes and Michie of amount due on bonds; failure of Forbes and Michie to turn over proportionate part to plaintiffs. Bill seeks an accounting. Also subpoena, Loockerman’s bonds, and letter of Gordon to Swinton in regard to sale of land.

Rutledge for plaintiffs.

October 3, 1769. Order for attachment against Forbes for failure to appear.

(Bundle 1767-1770)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-swinton-ctchansc-1769.