Elliott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Elliott v. State

190 S.W.2d 122, 148 Tex. Crim. 591, 1945 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 7, 1945

DocketNo. 23205.

StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.W.2d 122 (Elliott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elliott v. State, 190 S.W.2d 122, 148 Tex. Crim. 591, 1945 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824 (Tex. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for attempting to pass as true a forged instrument, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought forward. We find several bills of exception in the record, but none of them contains a recital of sufficient facts to enable the court to appraise the bills in the absence of the evidence produced upon the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for attempting to pass as true a forged instrument, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought forward. We find several bills of exception in the record, but none of them contains a recital of sufficient facts to enable the court to appraise the bills in the absence of the evidence produced upon the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 S.W.2d 122, 148 Tex. Crim. 591, 1945 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-state-texcrimapp-1945.