Elliott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Elliott v. State

190 S.W.2d 122, 148 Tex. Crim. 591, 1945 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Elliott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 Tex. Crim. 285 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 1945·No. No. 23205.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for attempting to pass as true a forged instrument, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought forward. We find several bills of exception in the record, but none of them contains a recital of sufficient facts to enable the court to appraise the bills in the absence of the evidence produced upon the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for attempting to pass as true a forged instrument, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought forward. We find several bills of exception in the record, but none of them contains a recital of sufficient facts to enable the court to appraise the bills in the absence of the evidence produced upon the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Elliott v. State, 190 S.W.2d 122, 148 Tex. Crim. 591, 1945 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 824 (Tex. 1945).

Pincite

190 S.W.2d 122 (Elliott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.