Elliott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Elliott v. State

1926 OK CR 104, 244 P. 204, 33 Okla. Crim. 423, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 20, 1926

DocketNo. A-5420.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 104 (Elliott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elliott v. State, 1926 OK CR 104, 244 P. 204, 33 Okla. Crim. 423, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell, and sentenced to confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $200. Appeal was filed in this court on the 5th day of February, 1925. No briefs have been filed in support of the appeal, and at the time of its submission no oral argument was made. In such case this court does not search the record for errors upon which to reverse, but will examine the record for jurisdictional or fundamental errors, and, if none such appear, and the evidence reasonably supports the verdict, will affirm the case. We have examined the record in this case. No prejudicial error is apparent, the defendant was properly charged, fairly tried, and the evidence fully sustains the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell, and sentenced to confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $200. Appeal was filed in this court on the 5th day of February, 1925. No briefs have been filed in support of the appeal, and at the time of its submission no oral argument was made. In such case this court does not search the record for errors upon which to reverse, but will examine the record for jurisdictional or fundamental errors, and, if none such appear, and the evidence reasonably supports the verdict, will affirm the case. We have examined the record in this case. No prejudicial error is apparent, the defendant was properly charged, fairly tried, and the evidence fully sustains the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 104, 244 P. 204, 33 Okla. Crim. 423, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.