Elliott v. State

1919 OK CR 100, 178 P. 891, 15 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 55
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 10, 1919
DocketNo. A-3093.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 100 (Elliott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elliott v. State, 1919 OK CR 100, 178 P. 891, 15 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 55 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Bert Elliott, was convicted in the district court of Carter county of keeping a place in the town of Wirt with the felonious intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment for two years and a fine of $50. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution is based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed. •• '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 100, 178 P. 891, 15 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.