Elliott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Elliott v. State

1913 OK CR 372, 136 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 665, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 368

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 13, 1913

DocketNo. A-1879.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 372 (Elliott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elliott v. State, 1913 OK CR 372, 136 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 665, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 368 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Carsie Elliott, was convicted at the October, 1912, term of the county court of Stephens county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of ninety days. The appeal was. filed in this court on the first day of December, 1912. On the 4th day of December, 1913, counsel for plaintiff in error filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and asked that mandate be issued forthwith. The motion is sustained and the appeal accordingly dismissed. The clerk is directed to issue mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Carsie Elliott, was convicted at the October, 1912, term of the county court of Stephens county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of ninety days. The appeal was. filed in this court on the first day of December, 1912. On the 4th day of December, 1913, counsel for plaintiff in error filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and asked that mandate be issued forthwith. The motion is sustained and the appeal accordingly dismissed. The clerk is directed to issue mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 372, 136 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 665, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.