Elliott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Elliott v. State

137 S.E. 862, 36 Ga. App. 654, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 221

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 12, 1927

Docket17922

StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 862 (Elliott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elliott v. State, 137 S.E. 862, 36 Ga. App. 654, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 221 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There. is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that requires a retrial of the ease; the evidence [655]*655supports the finding of the jury, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 12, 1927. William E. & Gordon Mann, for plaintiff in error. C. C. Pittman, solicitor-general, J. G. Mitchell, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

There. is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that requires a retrial of the ease; the evidence [655]*655supports the finding of the jury, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 12, 1927. William E. & Gordon Mann, for plaintiff in error. C. C. Pittman, solicitor-general, J. G. Mitchell, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S.E. 862, 36 Ga. App. 654, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-state-gactapp-1927.