Elliott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Elliott v. State

213 So. 3d 1113, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3898

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-3250·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Laura Kate Elliott’s conviction and sentence for violation of probation. With the benefit of counsel, Appellant admitted that she violated the terms of probation; however, the court’s order revoking her probation does not specify which conditions of probation she violated. Therefore, we remand the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of entering a written order specifying the conditions of probation Appellant violated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Laura Kate Elliott’s conviction and sentence for violation of probation. With the benefit of counsel, Appellant admitted that she violated the terms of probation; however, the court’s order revoking her probation does not specify which conditions of probation she violated. Therefore, we remand the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of entering a written order specifying the conditions of probation Appellant violated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Elliott v. State, 213 So. 3d 1113, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3898 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

213 So. 3d 1113 (Elliott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.