Elliott v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided January 23, 2024·No. 21-1929V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-1929V Filed: December 29, 2023

ROBERT ELLIOTT,

Petitioner, v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Michael Arvin Firestone, Marvin Firestone, MD, JD, and Associates, San Mateo, CA, for petitioner. Emily H. Manoso, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On September 29, 2021, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Transverse Myelitis (“TM”) and right sided shoulder pain and dysfunction as a result of his October 2, 2019 influenza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed December 28, 2023, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that she has experienced the residual effects of her condition for more than six months, that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her condition, and that her vaccine was administered in the United States. Petition at 2, 22; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged TM, right-sided shoulder pain with dysfunction, or any other injury or petitioner’s current disabilities. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this document contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be

made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the document will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on December 28, 2023, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Daniel T. Horner Daniel T. Horner Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ROBERT ELLIOTT, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 21- 1929V ) Special Master Homer v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. Petitioner, Robert Elliott, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-lO to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of the influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received the vaccine on or about October 2, 2019.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. The petition alleges that petitioner suffered transverse myelitis ("TM"), and right-

sided shoulder pain with dysfunction, that were caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine. Petitioner

further alleges that petitioner experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six

months.

S. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages arising out of the alleged vaccine injury. 6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner•s alleged TM, right-sided

shoulder pain with dysfunction. or any other injury or petitioner's current disabilities.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)(I ), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in any

proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and petitioner's attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa• l 5(g), to the ex.tent that payment has been made or can

reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis, and

represent that they have identified to respondent all known sources of payment for items or

2 services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U .S.C. § 300aa-l 5(g).

11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Elliott v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Elliott v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I)
§ 300aa-I5
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-I5(i)
§ 300aa-J
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-J
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
§ 300aa-lO
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-lO
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a