ELLIOTT v. RESURGENS, P.C. Et Al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

ELLIOTT v. RESURGENS, P.C. Et Al.

804 S.E.2d 696, 342 Ga. App. 647, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 392

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 28, 2017

DocketA15A2275

StatusPublished

This text of 804 S.E.2d 696 (ELLIOTT v. RESURGENS, P.C. Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ELLIOTT v. RESURGENS, P.C. Et Al., 804 S.E.2d 696, 342 Ga. App. 647, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 392 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Dillard, Chief Judge.

In Resurgens, P.C. v. Elliott, 301 Ga. 589 (800 SE2d 580) (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our previous decision in Elliott v. Resurgens, P.C., 336 Ga. App. 217 (782 SE2d 867) (2016), in which we reversed a jury verdict in favor of Resurgens, P.C. d/b/a Resurgens Orthopedics and Tapan K. Daftari, M.D., in Sean Elliott’s medical-malpractice action against them. Specifically, the Supreme Court of Georgia disagreed with our conclusion that the trial court’s exclusion of certain witness testimony required reversal of the jury’s verdict and held that the judgment below should be affirmed. Accordingly, we adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia as our own, and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington, P. J., and Mercier, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dillard, Chief Judge.

In Resurgens, P.C. v. Elliott, 301 Ga. 589 (800 SE2d 580) (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our previous decision in Elliott v. Resurgens, P.C., 336 Ga. App. 217 (782 SE2d 867) (2016), in which we reversed a jury verdict in favor of Resurgens, P.C. d/b/a Resurgens Orthopedics and Tapan K. Daftari, M.D., in Sean Elliott’s medical-malpractice action against them. Specifically, the Supreme Court of Georgia disagreed with our conclusion that the trial court’s exclusion of certain witness testimony required reversal of the jury’s verdict and held that the judgment below should be affirmed. Accordingly, we adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia as our own, and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington, P. J., and Mercier, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

804 S.E.2d 696, 342 Ga. App. 647, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-resurgens-pc-et-al-gactapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack