Elliott v. Prockter Produtions, Inc.
This text of 282 A.D. 758 (Elliott v. Prockter Produtions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff may not join a cause of action for breach of contract and a cause oE action based on an alleged settlement of the cause of action for breach of contract. This is not a matter of pleading but a matter of substantive law. Plaintiff has an election between an action on the contract and an action on an executory accord (Personal Property Law, § 33-a, subd. 3). Plainly he may not pursue both or present both to the court. The alternatives are not to he presented in a pleading but represent a choice which must be made by the plaintiff in advance of pleading. Orders unanimously modified to require the plaintiff to make an election between the two causes of action and to serve an amended complaint accordingly. Settle orders on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Breitel and Bergan, JJ. [See post, p. 761.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 758, 122 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-prockter-produtions-inc-nyappdiv-1953.