Elliott v. Payne

Supreme Court of Georgia

Elliott v. Payne

136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 493, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 13

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 13, 1927·No. No. 5324·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court did not err iu dismissing the case against the four defendants demurring generally to the petition, which included those against whom injunction was sought; and the plaintiff of his own motion having dismissed the case as to the two remaining defendants, the judgment of the court below is necessarily affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Henry Walker, for plaintiff. Benny & Wright, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court did not err iu dismissing the case against the four defendants demurring generally to the petition, which included those against whom injunction was sought; and the plaintiff of his own motion having dismissed the case as to the two remaining defendants, the judgment of the court below is necessarily affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Henry Walker, for plaintiff. Benny & Wright, for defendants.

Elliott v. Payne, 136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 493, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 13 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

136 S.E. 459 (Elliott v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.