Elliott v. Payne

Supreme Court of Georgia

Elliott v. Payne

136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 493, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 13

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 13, 1927

DocketNo. 5324

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 459 (Elliott v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elliott v. Payne, 136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 493, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 13 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court did not err iu dismissing the case against the four defendants demurring generally to the petition, which included those against whom injunction was sought; and the plaintiff of his own motion having dismissed the case as to the two remaining defendants, the judgment of the court below is necessarily affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Henry Walker, for plaintiff. Benny & Wright, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court did not err iu dismissing the case against the four defendants demurring generally to the petition, which included those against whom injunction was sought; and the plaintiff of his own motion having dismissed the case as to the two remaining defendants, the judgment of the court below is necessarily affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Henry Walker, for plaintiff. Benny & Wright, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 459, 163 Ga. 493, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-payne-ga-1927.