Elliott v. Paterson
3 P. 493, 65 Cal. 109, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 464
This text of 3 P. 493 (Elliott v. Paterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Elliott v. Paterson, 3 P. 493, 65 Cal. 109, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 464 (Cal. 1884).
Opinion
Application for a writ of mandate.
We are of the opinion that the writ should not issue, so long as the judgment stands; the judgment is not void on its face. The petitioner should procure the judgment to be set aside before making his application for mandamus.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kahn v. Smith
142 P.2d 13 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
Boyd v. Lancaster
90 P.2d 317 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
More v. Miller
53 P. 1077 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 P. 493, 65 Cal. 109, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-paterson-cal-1884.