Elliott v. Paterson
3 P. 493, 65 Cal. 109, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 464
Opinion
Application for a writ of mandate.
We are of the opinion that the writ should not issue, so long as the judgment stands; the judgment is not void on its face. The petitioner should procure the judgment to be set aside before making his application for mandamus.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elliott v. Paterson, 3 P. 493, 65 Cal. 109, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 464 (Cal. 1884).
3 P. 493 (Elliott v. Paterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kahn v. Smith
142 P.2d 13 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
Boyd v. Lancaster
90 P.2d 317 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
More v. Miller
53 P. 1077 (California Supreme Court, 1898)