Elliott v. McCalla

50 S.E. 960, 123 Ga. 26, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 365
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 S.E. 960 (Elliott v. McCalla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elliott v. McCalla, 50 S.E. 960, 123 Ga. 26, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 365 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Fish, P. J.

This case is controlled by the well-established rule, that, where the verdict was not demanded under the law and the evidence, the grant of a first new trial will not be disturbed, though based on a single ground, and. without regard to whether or not such ground was meritorious. Macon Consolidated St. R. Co. v. Jones, 116 Ga. 351, and cases cited; Cordray v. Savannah Ry. Co., 117 Ga. 464; Mock v. Savannah Ry. Co., 122 Ga. 386.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Candler, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freeman v. Franklin
170 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Hill v. Wadley Southern Railway Co.
57 S.E. 795 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 S.E. 960, 123 Ga. 26, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-mccalla-ga-1905.