Elliott v. McCalla
50 S.E. 960, 123 Ga. 26, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 365
Opinion
This case is controlled by the well-established rule, that, where the verdict was not demanded under the law and the evidence, the grant of a first new trial will not be disturbed, though based on a single ground, and. without regard to whether or not such ground was meritorious. Macon Consolidated St. R. Co. v. Jones, 116 Ga. 351, and cases cited; Cordray v. Savannah Ry. Co., 117 Ga. 464; Mock v. Savannah Ry. Co., 122 Ga. 386.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elliott v. McCalla, 50 S.E. 960, 123 Ga. 26, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 365 (Ga. 1905).
50 S.E. 960 (Elliott v. McCalla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freeman v. Franklin
170 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Hill v. Wadley Southern Railway Co.
57 S.E. 795 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)