Elliott v. McCalla
This text of 50 S.E. 960 (Elliott v. McCalla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is controlled by the well-established rule, that, where the verdict was not demanded under the law and the evidence, the grant of a first new trial will not be disturbed, though based on a single ground, and. without regard to whether or not such ground was meritorious. Macon Consolidated St. R. Co. v. Jones, 116 Ga. 351, and cases cited; Cordray v. Savannah Ry. Co., 117 Ga. 464; Mock v. Savannah Ry. Co., 122 Ga. 386.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 S.E. 960, 123 Ga. 26, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-mccalla-ga-1905.