Elliott v. Kelly

117 A.D.2d 1002, 499 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53244
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 1986·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting the petition. On this record, the written misbehavior report constitutes substantial evidence in support of the disciplinary charges levied and the penalty imposed (People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130; see, Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615). We also find that the use of a form petition, prepared and sworn to by petitioner’s counsel and containing no supporting factual allegations, fails to comply with the requirements of the CPLR and is facially deficient (Matter of Dennehy v Coughlin, 116 AD2d 1001). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.—art 78.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott v. Kelly, 117 A.D.2d 1002, 499 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

117 A.D.2d 1002 (Elliott v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawford v. Kelly
124 A.D.2d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Gaines v. Kelly
117 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)