Elliott v. KB Home North Carolina, Inc.

759 S.E.2d 98, 367 N.C. 512, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 506, 2014 WL 2807566
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 11, 2014·No. 418P12-2·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s (KB Home Raleigh-Durham, Inc.) NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question

2. Defs (KB Home Raleigh-Durham Inc.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Motion to Admit Matthew H. Lembke Pro Hac Vice

4. Motion to Admit Kevin C. Newsom Pro Hac Vice

5. Motion to Admit Edmund S. Sauer Pro Hac Vice

6. Pits’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal

1.—

2. Denied

3. Allowed

4. Allowed

5. Allowed

6. Allowed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott v. KB Home North Carolina, Inc., 759 S.E.2d 98, 367 N.C. 512, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 506, 2014 WL 2807566 (N.C. 2014).

759 S.E.2d 98 (Elliott v. KB Home North Carolina, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31