Elliott v. KB Home North Carolina, Inc.

759 S.E.2d 98, 367 N.C. 512, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 506, 2014 WL 2807566
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 11, 2014
Docket418P12-2
StatusPublished

This text of 759 S.E.2d 98 (Elliott v. KB Home North Carolina, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elliott v. KB Home North Carolina, Inc., 759 S.E.2d 98, 367 N.C. 512, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 506, 2014 WL 2807566 (N.C. 2014).

Opinion

1. Def’s (KB Home Raleigh-Durham, Inc.) NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question

2. Defs (KB Home Raleigh-Durham Inc.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Motion to Admit Matthew H. Lembke Pro Hac Vice

4. Motion to Admit Kevin C. Newsom Pro Hac Vice

5. Motion to Admit Edmund S. Sauer Pro Hac Vice

6. Pits’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal

1.—

2. Denied

3. Allowed

4. Allowed

5. Allowed

6. Allowed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
759 S.E.2d 98, 367 N.C. 512, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 506, 2014 WL 2807566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-kb-home-north-carolina-inc-nc-2014.