Elliott v. Huston, Darbee & Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Elliott v. Huston, Darbee & Co.

112 A. 829, 31 Del. 191, 1 W.W. Harr. 191, 1921 Del. LEXIS 8

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedFebruary 14, 1921

DocketAppeal No. 37

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A. 829 (Elliott v. Huston, Darbee & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elliott v. Huston, Darbee & Co., 112 A. 829, 31 Del. 191, 1 W.W. Harr. 191, 1921 Del. LEXIS 8 (Del. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Conrad, J.

The motion to allow an amendment of the certificate comes too late after the first Friday of the term. The certificate annexed to the transcfript filed does not meet the requirements of the statute.

The appeal is dismissed.

Note: No point was made of the fact that the plaintiff below was misnamed in the Justice’s certificate, as “Huston Darbee Company” instead of “Huston Darbee and Company.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conrad, J.

The motion to allow an amendment of the certificate comes too late after the first Friday of the term. The certificate annexed to the transcfript filed does not meet the requirements of the statute.

The appeal is dismissed.

Note: No point was made of the fact that the plaintiff below was misnamed in the Justice’s certificate, as “Huston Darbee Company” instead of “Huston Darbee and Company.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A. 829, 31 Del. 191, 1 W.W. Harr. 191, 1921 Del. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-huston-darbee-co-delsuperct-1921.