Elliott v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
11 Misc. 2d 136, 179 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3799
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 27, 1958·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Hofstadter, Steuer and Aurelio, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elliott v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 11 Misc. 2d 136, 179 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
11 Misc. 2d 136 (Elliott v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dafeng Hengwei Textile Co. v. Aceco Industrial & Commercial Corp.
54 F. Supp. 3d 279 (E.D. New York, 2014)
Nippon Emo-Trans Co., Ltd. v. Emo-Trans, Inc.
744 F. Supp. 1215 (E.D. New York, 1990)
Thornock v. Kinderhill Corp.
712 F. Supp. 1123 (S.D. New York, 1989)
Trigo Hnos., Inc. v. Premium Wholesale Groceries, Inc.
424 F. Supp. 1125 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Incontrade, Inc. v. Oilborn International, S. A.
407 F. Supp. 1359 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Aerotrade, Inc. v. Banque Nationale De La Republique D'Haiti
376 F. Supp. 1286 (S.D. New York, 1974)
Waterman-Bic Corp. v. L. E. Waterman Pen Co.
19 Misc. 2d 421 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)