Elliott v. Employment Division
This text of 567 P.2d 621 (Elliott v. Employment Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this unemployment compensation case claimant was not allowed certain benefits on the ground that he had left his employment voluntarily without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c). The Employment Appeals Board affirmed the disallowance by the Employment Division and the referee.
Claimant contends that two of the nine findings of fact made by the Employment Appeals Board in arriving at its decision were not supported by substantial evidence. While the evidence as to these two findings was somewhat ambiguous and might well have resulted in findings contrary to those made by the Board, the evidence supporting these findings was sufficient to make fact questions.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
567 P.2d 621, 30 Or. App. 659, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-employment-division-orctapp-1977.