Elliott v. Elliott

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Elliott v. Elliott

782 So. 2d 312, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 603, 2000 WL 1451184

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedSeptember 29, 2000

Docket2980265

StatusPublished

This text of 782 So. 2d 312 (Elliott v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elliott v. Elliott, 782 So. 2d 312, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 603, 2000 WL 1451184 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

MONROE, Judge.

A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme [313]*313Court of Alabama and the case has been remanded. In compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, Ex parte Elliott, 782 So.2d 308 (Ala.2000), we affirm those portions of the trial court’s judgment relating to the issues of alimony and property division.

We have previously affirmed the child-custody provisions of the trial court’s judgment, and we have previously reversed the child-support provisions and ordered a remand based on that reversal. Because we are now affirming the property-division provision and the alimony provision, we also affirm those portions of the judgment dividing the marital debts.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI