Elliott v. Elliott

782 So. 2d 312, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 603, 2000 WL 1451184
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Elliott v. Elliott. Read the opinion of the Court — 782 So. 2d 303
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 29, 2000·No. 2980265·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

MONROE, Judge.

A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme [313]*313Court of Alabama and the case has been remanded. In compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, Ex parte Elliott, 782 So.2d 308 (Ala.2000), we affirm those portions of the trial court’s judgment relating to the issues of alimony and property division.

We have previously affirmed the child-custody provisions of the trial court’s judgment, and we have previously reversed the child-support provisions and ordered a remand based on that reversal. Because we are now affirming the property-division provision and the alimony provision, we also affirm those portions of the judgment dividing the marital debts.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott v. Elliott, 782 So. 2d 312, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 603, 2000 WL 1451184 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

782 So. 2d 312 (Elliott v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Elliott
782 So. 2d 308 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)