Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Elliott v. Currie

Elliott v. Currie

92 S.E. 945, 20 Ga. App. 255, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 849
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1917
Docket8215, 8216
StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E. 945 (Elliott v. Currie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elliott v. Currie, 92 S.E. 945, 20 Ga. App. 255, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 849 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Upon the record, the agreement, and the answer of the ordinary to the writ of certiorari, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., eoneur. . Certiorari; from Wbeeler superior court—Judge Graham. September 9, 1916. O. M. Dulce, for plaintiff in error. A. C. Saffold, J. P. Tomlinson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 945, 20 Ga. App. 255, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-currie-gactapp-1917.