Elliott v. Cook
33 Ala. 490
Opinion
The appellant does not show, by his petition, that he was “'prevented from making his defense by surprise, accident, mistake, or fraud, without fault on his part.” The demurrer to the petition was, therefore, properly sustained; and the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.—White v. Ryan & Martin, 31 Ala. 400; Stewart v. Williams, at the present term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elliott v. Cook, 33 Ala. 490 (Ala. 1859).
33 Ala. 490 (Elliott v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Little v. Peevy
189 So. 720 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
Talladega Mercantile Co. v. McDonald
97 Ala. 508 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Ex parte Wallace
60 Ala. 267 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Ex parte Walker
54 Ala. 577 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Ex parte Carroll
50 Ala. 9 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1873)
Ketchum v. Dennis
41 Ala. 183 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1867)
Dothard v. Teague
40 Ala. 583 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1867)
Allington v. Tucker
38 Ala. 655 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1863)