Elliott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided September 30, 2024·No. 3:23-cv-01443·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON RANDY LOWELL ELLIOTT, 3:23-cv-01443-AA Plaintiff, vs. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $3,424.68 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the fees shall be delivered via electronic funds transfer or by check made out to Plaintiff’s attorney Kevin Kerr, and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office as follows: NW Disability benefits, LLC dba Kerr Robichaux & Carroll (TID 85- 3999428), P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff and sent via electronic funds

transfer or by check mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. DATED this _3_0_t_h_ day of ___S_e_p_t_e_m_b_e_r________, 2024. __/s_/A__n_n_ A__ik_e_n____________________ Ann Aiken United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2024).

Elliott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Elliott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)