Elliott v. Capital City Bank

Supreme Court of Florida

Elliott v. Capital City Bank

87 So. 784, 81 Fla. 266, 1921 Fla. LEXIS 593

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 3, 1921·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and Ellis, J. J., concur.

West, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and Ellis, J. J., concur.

West, J., not participating.

Elliott v. Capital City Bank, 87 So. 784, 81 Fla. 266, 1921 Fla. LEXIS 593 (Fla. 1921).

Pincite

87 So. 784 (Elliott v. Capital City Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.