Elliott v. Butler
This text of 868 N.E.2d 226 (Elliott v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order re[973]*973versed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Albany County, for a traverse hearing. The parties’ submissions on the motion to dismiss raise issues of fact requiring a traverse hearing.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
868 N.E.2d 226, 8 N.Y.3d 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-butler-ny-2007.