Elliott v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
This text of 191 P.3d 670 (Elliott v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony Blake ELLIOTT, Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Peter Ozanne, Executive Director, and Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services.
Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Ryan Kahn, Assistant Attorney General.
Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and HUCKLEBERRY, Judge pro tempore.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Cole v. Board of Parole, 220 Or.App. 362, 186 P.3d 321 (2008).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 P.3d 670, 221 Or. App. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-board-of-parole-and-post-prison-supervision-orctapp-2008.