Elliott v. Beard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Elliott v. Beard

962 A.2d 631

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 2009·No. 47 EAP 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2009, this appeal from the Commonwealth Court’s August 13, 2008 Order denying Appellant’s Motion for Reconsideration is quashed. See, e.g., In re Merrick’s Estate, 432 Pa. 450, 247 A.2d 786, 787 (1968) (quashing appeal from unappealable court order denying reconsideration); Murkey v. Corbin, 115 Pa.Cmwlth. 258, 533 A.2d 1091 (1987), appeal denied, 520 Pa. 621, 554 A.2d 512 (1988) (same); Boden v. Tompkins, 306 Pa.Super. 494, 452 A.2d 833, 834 (1982) (same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2009, this appeal from the Commonwealth Court’s August 13, 2008 Order denying Appellant’s Motion for Reconsideration is quashed. See, e.g., In re Merrick’s Estate, 432 Pa. 450, 247 A.2d 786, 787 (1968) (quashing appeal from unappealable court order denying reconsideration); Murkey v. Corbin, 115 Pa.Cmwlth. 258, 533 A.2d 1091 (1987), appeal denied, 520 Pa. 621, 554 A.2d 512 (1988) (same); Boden v. Tompkins, 306 Pa.Super. 494, 452 A.2d 833, 834 (1982) (same).

Elliott v. Beard, 962 A.2d 631 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

962 A.2d 631 (Elliott v. Beard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related