Elliott-Thomas v. Smith

2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 907, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1406
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 26, 2017
Docket2017-0693
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 6964 (Elliott-Thomas v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elliott-Thomas v. Smith, 2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 907, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1406 (Ohio 2017).

Opinion

Trumbull App. No. 2015-T-0007, 2017-Ohio-702. On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 5 of the court of appeals’ entry filed May 4, 2017: “Does the tort of intentional interference with or destruction of evidence include claims alleging interference with or concealment of evidence that disrupt a plaintiffs underlying case? Or, is the tort of intentional interference with or destruction of evidence limited to claims that allege evidence is physically altered or destroyed?”

The conflict cases are O’Brien v. Olmsted Falls, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga Nos. 89966 and 90336, 2008-Ohio-2658, Allstate Ins. Co. v. QED Consultants, 5th Dist. Knox No. 09CA14, 2009-Ohio-4896, and McGuire v. Draper, Hollenbaugh & Briscoe Co., L.P.A., 4th Dist. Highland No. 01CA21, 2002-Ohio-6170.

The clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the court of appeals for Trumbull County.

O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Brien v. City of Olmsted Falls, 89966 (6-2-2008)
2008 Ohio 2658 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
Elliott-Thomas v. Smith
2017 Ohio 702 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 907, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-thomas-v-smith-ohio-2017.