Elliott Sheppard v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Elliott Sheppard v. United States

355 F.2d 206

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 31, 1966·No. 19749·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

From an examination of the evidence supporting the conviction of appellant on Count II, we are convinced it was insufficient. The judgment of conviction as to Count II is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court with direction to dismiss Count II.

From an examination of the evidence supporting the conviction of appellant on Count III, we are convinced the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. The evidentiary errors asserted by appellant we find to be without merit, under the circumstances here existing. The judgment of conviction on Count III is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

From an examination of the evidence supporting the conviction of appellant on Count II, we are convinced it was insufficient. The judgment of conviction as to Count II is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court with direction to dismiss Count II.

From an examination of the evidence supporting the conviction of appellant on Count III, we are convinced the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. The evidentiary errors asserted by appellant we find to be without merit, under the circumstances here existing. The judgment of conviction on Count III is affirmed.

Elliott Sheppard v. United States, 355 F.2d 206 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

355 F.2d 206 (Elliott Sheppard v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.