Elliott Jay Franklin v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 8, 2017
DocketA17A1505
StatusPublished

This text of Elliott Jay Franklin v. State (Elliott Jay Franklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elliott Jay Franklin v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 19, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1505. ELLIOTT JAY FRANKLIN v. THE STATE.

In 2002, Elliott Jay Franklin was convicted of possession of cocaine and marijuana with intent to distribute and obstruction of an officer. We affirmed his convictions on appeal. Franklin v. State, 281 Ga. App. 409 (636 SE2d 114) (2006). In 2016, Franklin filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct his void judgment and sentence, which the trial court denied. Franklin appeals from the trial court’s order, however, we lack jurisdiction. Franklin has previously appealed from trial court orders denying his motions to vacate. See Franklin v. State, Case Nos. A14A1607 and A14A1608, (dismissed May 16, 2014). As we instructed Franklin in the order dismissing those appeals, “a petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed. See Harper, supra; Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to vacate a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. See Harper, supra at n.1; Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only if it imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611 (a) (409 SE2d 517) (1991). In his motion, Franklin challenges the sufficiency of the indictment. His arguments relate to the legitimacy of his convictions, not his sentence. Because Franklin may not attack his convictions at this juncture and did not assert a colorable void-sentence claim, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/19/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Franklin v. State
636 S.E.2d 114 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Burg v. State
676 S.E.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Roberts v. State
690 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Crumbley v. State
409 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Elliott Jay Franklin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-jay-franklin-v-state-gactapp-2017.