Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States
37 F.3d 617, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31508
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 8, 1994·No. No. 93-8027·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Prior Report: 13 F.3d 1555
The judges of the en banc court are equally divided on the proper disposition of this case. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED by operation of law. See, e.g., Smith v. Zant, 887 F.2d 1407, 1408 (11th Cir.1989); Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States, 37 F.3d 617, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31508 (11th Cir. 1994).
37 F.3d 617 (Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lanus Ex Rel. Estate of Lanus v. United States
492 F. App'x 66 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States
37 F.3d 617 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)