Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States
37 F.3d 617, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31508
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1994
DocketNo. 93-8027
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 37 F.3d 617 (Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States, 37 F.3d 617, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31508 (11th Cir. 1994).
Opinion
Prior Report: 13 F.3d 1555
The judges of the en banc court are equally divided on the proper disposition of this case. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED by operation of law. See, e.g., Smith v. Zant, 887 F.2d 1407, 1408 (11th Cir.1989); Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lanus Ex Rel. Estate of Lanus v. United States
492 F. App'x 66 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States
37 F.3d 617 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
37 F.3d 617, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-ex-rel-elliott-v-united-states-ca11-1994.