Elliot Ventura v. the State of Texas
This text of Elliot Ventura v. the State of Texas (Elliot Ventura v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-22-00152-CR
ELLIOT VENTURA, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 100th District Court Carson County, Texas Trial Court No. 7100, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding
November 21, 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Elliot Ventura, appeals his conviction for evading arrest1 and sentence
to thirty years’ confinement. The appellate record was originally due September 14, 2022.
The clerk’s record has been filed but we granted the reporter an extension of time to file
the reporter’s record due to her caseload. By letter of October 11, 2022, we admonished
the reporter that failure to file the reporter’s record by October 24 could result in the appeal
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04. being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without
further notice. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and the reporter has had
no further communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly
responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring
appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to
preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,
the trial court shall determine the following:
1. what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
2. why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;
3. what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those
tasks; and
4. whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court
finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days
to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter
to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by December
21, 2022.
2 Should the reporter file the record on or before December 5, 2022, she is directed
to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall
not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Elliot Ventura v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliot-ventura-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.