Elliot v. Hayman
2 D.C. 678
This text of 2 D.C. 678 (Elliot v. Hayman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Elliot v. Hayman, 2 D.C. 678 (circtddc 1826).
Opinion
overruled the objection, being of opinion that the certificate of the «magistrate was sufficient evidence of that fact.
The defendant then offered to examine persons skilled in the comparison of handwriting, to prove that the body of the certificate of the magistrate was not in his handwriting.
But the Court (nem. con.) refused to permit them to be examined.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 D.C. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliot-v-hayman-circtddc-1826.