Elliot v. Elliot

133 Mass. 555, 1882 Mass. LEXIS 288
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 25, 1882·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Morton, C. J.

We are of opinion that the court has no jurisdiction of these cases. There, has been no final judgment in the Superior Court in either case. Boyce v. Wheeler, ante, 554, and cases cited.

The judgment of the Superior Court in each case is that the petitioner is entitled to have assigned to her the real estate, or her interest therein, according to her petition. It is in its nature like the interlocutory judgment for partition, and must be followed by other proceedings before the case is ready for final judgment. Gen. Sts. c. 90, §§ 3, 5, 15, 17. Pub. Sts. c. 124, §§ 10, 11, 17. St. 1880, a. 211, § 2.

Commissioners to assign to her the land, or her interest therein, must be appointed, and, until their report and its acceptance by the court, there can be no final disposition of the case.

Appeals dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliot v. Elliot, 133 Mass. 555, 1882 Mass. LEXIS 288 (Mass. 1882).

133 Mass. 555 (Elliot v. Elliot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.
20 N.E.2d 465 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
104 N.E. 343 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Brownell v. Briggs
54 N.E. 251 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Brennan v. McInnis
51 N.E. 974 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Lowd v. Brigham
154 Mass. 107 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)