Ellington v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ellington v. State

123 S.E. 874, 158 Ga. 582, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 303

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 19, 1924

DocketNo. 4178

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 874 (Ellington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellington v. State, 123 S.E. 874, 158 Ga. 582, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 303 (Ga. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

The motion for new trial contains only the usual general grounds. The jury were authorized to find the defendant guilty of murder; and the trial court being satisfied with the verdict, we cannot disturb it.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Lester G. Liclcson and B. D. Murphy, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, and T. B. Gress, asst, atty.-gen., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

The motion for new trial contains only the usual general grounds. The jury were authorized to find the defendant guilty of murder; and the trial court being satisfied with the verdict, we cannot disturb it.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Lester G. Liclcson and B. D. Murphy, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, and T. B. Gress, asst, atty.-gen., contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 S.E. 874, 158 Ga. 582, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellington-v-state-ga-1924.