Ellington v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ellington v. Senkowski

306 A.D.2d 662, 759 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 662 (Ellington v. Senkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellington v. Senkowski, 306 A.D.2d 662, 759 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Cardona, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered February 4, 2002 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner challenges his continued incarceration in the custody of the Department of Correctional Services based upon its failure to release him to parole supervision on his conditional release date of September 26, 2001. In the judgment on appeal, Supreme Court denied petitioner’s application, ruling that he had failed to comply with certain special conditions that had been properly imposed by the Division of Parole, including the requirement that he locate an approved postrelease residence.

Petitioner’s appeal to this Court from that judgment has been rendered moot by his release from state custody on May 23, 2003, after having served the maximum term of his sentence of imprisonment (see Matter of Ferro v Luvera, 288 AD2d 735 [2001]). This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI