Ellington v. . Ellington

168 S.E. 672, 204 N.C. 785, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 282
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 29, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 S.E. 672 (Ellington v. . Ellington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellington v. . Ellington, 168 S.E. 672, 204 N.C. 785, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 282 (N.C. 1933).

Opinion

Petition for partition, with prayer on the part of two of the respondents that executor and trustee be required to file true and correct account of his stewardship, as upon application to surcharge and falsify. The matter was referred, as it involved an accounting, and resulted in benefit to the estate; whereupon application was made for allowance out of the estate of counsel fees to attorneys for the two respondents who demanded that the executor and trustee be called to book. Application denied on the ground that the court "is without power to make such allowance." Appeal by applicants. Affirmed on authority of Mordecai v. Devereux, 74 N.C. 673, and In reWill of Howell, ante, 437.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crutchfield v. . Foster
200 S.E. 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.E. 672, 204 N.C. 785, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellington-v-ellington-nc-1933.