Ellington v. Coleman

34 Ga. 425
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HA~I~IS, J.

This case was fairly submitted to the jury-the law properly given in charge; and the jury have passed upon the testimony, as was their right~ It is not within our competency to set their verdict aside as being contrary to evidence, in consequence of the shape in which the matter is presented.

There was no motion for a new triaL ilad such a motion been made and overruled, and the decison, accompanied by the testimony, been embodied in the bill of exceptions, we then could have reviewed the finding of the jury, and mined whether it was against evidence or not. ~

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellington v. Coleman, 34 Ga. 425 (Ga. 1866).

34 Ga. 425 (Ellington v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Potter v. Potter
149 S.E. 579 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)