Ellinger v. Crowl

17 Md. 361
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 29, 1861·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Goldsborotjgh, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court, on .the re-hearing.

We adopt as correct the statement of the pleadings and evidence as made by the Chief Justice, and also his statement of the law as applicable to the case, but dissent from his view of the effect of the testimóny. We are of opinion that the circumstances detailed in the proceedings, establish a valuable as well as a good consideration for the deed from Henry Crowl to his wife, Agnes, and also that at the time of [379] Vhe making of the said deed, the grantor had property other than that mentioned in the deed, sufficient to pay all his indebtedness shown by this record. This being so, the deed cannot be successfully assailed by his creditors, and we therefore affirm the decrees of the circuit court.

(Decided Oct. 29th, 1861.)

Deorees affirmed, with costs.

LeGranp, C. J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellinger v. Crowl, 17 Md. 361 (Md. 1861).

17 Md. 361 (Ellinger v. Crowl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albreast v. Heaton
160 So. 2d 470 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Bokel, Gwynn, McKenney Co. v. Costello
22 App. D.C. 81 (D.C. Circuit, 1903)
McKeown v. Allen
37 Fla. 490 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1896)
Gwynn v. Butler
17 Colo. 114 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1891)
Scoggin v. Schloath
15 P. 635 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1887)
Hubbard v. Allen
59 Ala. 283 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)