Ellery v. Amelung's Syndics

Superior Court of Louisiana

Ellery v. Amelung's Syndics

2 Mart. 242

Superior Court of Louisiana·Decided July 1, 1812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Heis only to be collocated on the tableau for that sum. The code allows a pri- [243] viledge in favour of law charges, frais de justice. The English expression. is rather vague-the French one is only, costs of court : taxed costs.

Mazureau, for the plaintiff. Moreau, for the defendants.

A creditor who claims to be paid, in exclusion of the others, must make out his right strictly. Priviledges are odious and should be restrained.

Priviledge denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Heis only to be collocated on the tableau for that sum. The code allows a pri- [243] viledge in favour of law charges, frais de justice. The English expression. is rather vague-the French one is only, costs of court : taxed costs.

Mazureau, for the plaintiff. Moreau, for the defendants.

A creditor who claims to be paid, in exclusion of the others, must make out his right strictly. Priviledges are odious and should be restrained.

Priviledge denied.

Ellery v. Amelung's Syndics, 2 Mart. 242 (La. Super. Ct. 1812).

Pincite

2 Mart. 242 (Ellery v. Amelung's Syndics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related