Ellermets v. Department of the Army

Federal Circuit

Ellermets v. Department of the Army

134 F. App'x 442

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 1, 2005·No. No. 05-3113·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PROST, Circuit Judge.

Arne Ellermets submits a letter thanking the court for “ensuring that my case is, first, handled at the lowest legal level possible,” which the court treats as a response to its April 20, 2005 order.

The court’s order directed Ellermets to show cause why his petition for review should not be dismissed as premature in light of the fact that his petition for review of the same matter remains pending before the Merit Systems Protection Board. It appears that Ellermets agrees that the Board should review his case before the matter is reviewed by this court.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for review is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PROST, Circuit Judge.

Arne Ellermets submits a letter thanking the court for “ensuring that my case is, first, handled at the lowest legal level possible,” which the court treats as a response to its April 20, 2005 order.

The court’s order directed Ellermets to show cause why his petition for review should not be dismissed as premature in light of the fact that his petition for review of the same matter remains pending before the Merit Systems Protection Board. It appears that Ellermets agrees that the Board should review his case before the matter is reviewed by this court.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for review is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Ellermets v. Department of the Army, 134 F. App'x 442 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

134 F. App'x 442 (Ellermets v. Department of the Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.