Eller I.T.O. v. Pandolfo & Alvarez
This text of Eller I.T.O. v. Pandolfo & Alvarez (Eller I.T.O. v. Pandolfo & Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 8, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D15-204 Lower Tribunal No. 13-4180 ________________
Eller-I.T.O. Stevedoring Company, L.L.C., et al., Petitioners,
vs.
Lazaro Pandolfo and Olga Alvarez, etc., Respondents.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Prohibition.
Hamilton, Miller & Birthisel and Jerry D. Hamilton and Robert M. Oldershaw and Michael J. Dono, for petitioners.
Dorta Law and Matias R. Dorta and Gonzalo R. Dorta, for respondents.
Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and SCALES, JJ.
SUAREZ, J.
Eller-I.T.O. Stevedoring Company LLC and Dwayne Cooper, petitioners,
seek a writ of prohibition, writ of certiorari, or writ of mandamus in response to the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. We deny
the petition for each of the writs sought by the petitioners.
Petitions denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eller I.T.O. v. Pandolfo & Alvarez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eller-ito-v-pandolfo-alvarez-fladistctapp-2015.