Ellenstein v. Herman Body Co.

129 A.2d 268, 23 N.J. 348, 1957 N.J. LEXIS 233
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 4, 1957·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Weintraub in the court below.

For affirmance — Justices Heher, Oliphant, Burling and Jacobs — 4. For reversal — Chief Justice Vanderbilt — -1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellenstein v. Herman Body Co., 129 A.2d 268, 23 N.J. 348, 1957 N.J. LEXIS 233 (N.J. 1957).

129 A.2d 268 (Ellenstein v. Herman Body Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Toms v. Lawyers Mutual Liability Insurance
408 S.E.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
Matter of Silverman
549 A.2d 1225 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1988)
Taylor v. Hoboken Bd. of Educ.
455 A.2d 552 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
In Re Gallop
426 A.2d 509 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)
Watkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
376 So. 2d 660 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)
Miller v. Metzinger
91 Cal. App. 3d 31 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
Tormo v. Yormark
398 F. Supp. 1159 (D. New Jersey, 1975)
Smith v. Travelers Indemnity Company
343 F. Supp. 605 (M.D. North Carolina, 1972)