Ellenbarger v. Branstetter

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ellenbarger v. Branstetter

539 S.W.3d 88

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 2018

DocketWD 80468

StatusPublished

This text of 539 S.W.3d 88 (Ellenbarger v. Branstetter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellenbarger v. Branstetter, 539 S.W.3d 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Shane Branstetter appeals from a judgment entering a full order of protection to Crystal Ellenbarger. Branstetter alleges error in the admission of an anonymous letter over his hearsay objection, and that entry of the full order of protection was against the weight of the evidence, not supported by substantial evidence, and misapplied the law. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Shane Branstetter appeals from a judgment entering a full order of protection to Crystal Ellenbarger. Branstetter alleges error in the admission of an anonymous letter over his hearsay objection, and that entry of the full order of protection was against the weight of the evidence, not supported by substantial evidence, and misapplied the law. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 S.W.3d 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellenbarger-v-branstetter-moctapp-2018.