Elleman v. Gulf Equipment Co.

83 So. 2d 19
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 1955
StatusPublished

This text of 83 So. 2d 19 (Elleman v. Gulf Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Elleman v. Gulf Equipment Co., 83 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Attorneys for Appellee Walter Hygema have filed motion for the entry of an order affirming judgment in this cause as to him pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion as to said appellee is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised as to [20]*20said appellee on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from as to Appellee Walter Hygema, individually and doing business as Hygema House Moving Company, be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THORN-AL and O’CONNELL, TJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 So. 2d 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elleman-v-gulf-equipment-co-fla-1955.