Ellefson v. Cherney
This text of 11 N.W.2d 527 (Ellefson v. Cherney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff and an order denying motion for new trial. The case was tried upon its merits before the court without a jury, and findings of facts and conclusions of law were entered. The sufficiency of the evidence is the only error complained of, and without reciting the facts and the contentions of the parties, it is sufficient to state that we have carefully examined the record and that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of facts.
The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
All the Judges concur, except WARREN, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 N.W.2d 527, 69 S.D. 453, 1943 S.D. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellefson-v-cherney-sd-1943.