Ellard v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.
22 S.E. 893, 97 Ga. 329
Opinion
The only material question presented by the bill of exceptions being whether or not it was lawful to contract for interest upon interest overdue, and this question having been settled adversely to the plaintiff in error by the decisions of this court in various cases, including that of Merck v. American &c. Mortgage Co., 79 Ga. 213, no reason for reversing the judgment below appears. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ellard v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co., 22 S.E. 893, 97 Ga. 329 (Ga. 1895).
22 S.E. 893 (Ellard v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frazier v. City Investment Co.
157 S.E. 102 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Morgan v. Mortgage Discount Co.
129 So. 589 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Haley v. Covington
92 S.E. 297 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Butler v. First National Bank
78 S.E. 772 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Stanford v. Coram
67 P. 1005 (Montana Supreme Court, 1902)